Are you part of an in-house HR team frustrated by the challenges of resolving internal conflicts? If so, you’re not alone.
Internal conflict resolution can hit a snag for various reasons but fear not! Here are some common hurdles and ways to overcome them:
1. Lack of Participation: Sometimes, parties may be reluctant to fully engage in a process to resolve the conflict, hindering progress. Try and encourage open communication and suggest mediation, emphasising the benefits. Remember that participating in mediation is entirely voluntary and no one should be forced into it. I’m always happy to have an informal chat with anyone who is unsure if they want to participate.
2. Imbalance of Power: In certain cases, there may be an imbalance of power between parties, affecting the dynamics when trying to resolve internally. A skilled mediator can mitigate this by creating a safe and unbiased space for all involved however it might make people reluctant to start so reassuring people that it is a safe space will really help.
3. Inadequate Preparation: Insufficient preparation by both parties can impede the effectiveness of any informal internal process. Encouraging parties to come prepared with their concerns and desired outcomes is essential. As a mediator I make sure I am clear on what the issues are, how it has impacted them, what their needs and goals are so I can help facilitate a positive outcome.
4. Lingering Resentment: If conflicts have been ongoing, deep-rooted resentment may persist despite best efforts (another reason why mediation should be a first resort and not a last resort). Regular follow-ups and continued support may be necessary to address any lingering issues. It is sometimes helpful to encourage the parties to share their agreement with a trusted manager, for example in HR, so that they can offer inhouse, onsite support ongoing to ensure their agreement is kept to.
5. Miscommunication: Misunderstandings usually occur during an escalating conflict. Active listening and clear communication can help prevent misinterpretations and facilitate meaningful dialogue. I always find it helpful to summarise at regular intervals to check that we are all clear on what is being discussed.
6. Lack of Closure: Some internal grievance processes may not result in a clear resolution, leaving parties feeling unsatisfied. During mediation, we explore alternative approaches or best-case alternatives to an agreement where these might be appropriate, as well as discussing what the worst-case scenario will be if they don’t reach an agreement.
Recognising these challenges underscores the importance of a seasoned, neutral mediator. Internal processes hold value, but an external mediator can deftly navigate these complexities.
Remember, you don’t have to navigate these choppy waters alone. Let me be your resolution partner. Reach out and I can help!
What do you do when an employee appeals a decision during a disciplinary process?
Picture this: after a meticulous disciplinary procedure, you’ve made a tough decision to dismiss an employee for gross misconduct. Just when you thought the process was behind you, an appeal lands on your desk.
Appeals are a vital part of the fair process, as stipulated by the ACAS code of practice on disciplinary procedures. However, handling these appeals presents unique challenges, especially for small businesses or those navigating limited internal resources.
Enter the solution: an external HR consultant to oversee the appeal process. Here’s why this can be your smartest move:
Neutral and Objective Perspective: External consultants bring impartiality, ensuring a fair hearing that’s free from internal biases. Their objectivity ensures decisions are based solely on the case’s merits.
Expertise in Employment Law: While internal managers may lack legal expertise, HR consultants offer in-depth knowledge of employment law, ensuring compliance and minimizing legal risks.
Fresh Insights and Experience: Consultants offer diverse HR experience, providing innovative approaches and spotting potential pitfalls that might be overlooked internally.
Reduced Conflict of Interest: Bringing in external consultants alleviates conflicts of interest arising from internal involvement in the dismissal process, ensuring transparency and objectivity.
Confidentiality and Efficiency: Maintaining confidentiality, consultants streamline the process, avoiding delays often caused by internal scheduling conflicts. Their efficiency expedites resolution.
Enhanced Credibility: External oversight enhances the appeal’s credibility, fostering trust among employees and demonstrating a commitment to fair processes.
When an appeal arises, seeking external expertise ensures fairness, compliance, and efficiency. As an experienced HR consultant, I specialize in overseeing appeals. Get in touch today for an informal chat about how I can help you.
What to Do When Faced with Unfair Dismissal Accusations During the Redundancy Process
Dealing with an employee’s claim of unfair dismissal amidst a redundancy process is a scenario I’ve encountered in my in-house HR manager days as well as in my HR consultancy practice. It’s a question that arises frequently with my clients. Despite meticulous preparation, thorough business cases, and adherence to fair processes, employees might assert, “This isn’t right, it’s an unfair dismissal.”
In my experience, in about 8 out of 10 cases, what they truly mean is, “This just feels unfair.” They’re grappling with the emotional weight of the situation, feeling disillusioned about a decision that seemingly contradicts their hard work and the positive rapport they shared with their employer. Rarely does it signify a belief in genuine unfair dismissal.
So, if faced with this accusation, consider the following five tips:
Clarify the Current Stage: Remind the employee that until a final decision is reached, no dismissal has occurred. This can help them engage more effectively in the consultation process.
Don’t panic: Remember, to successfully defend against a claim of unfair dismissal, employers need to demonstrate a fair reason (like redundancy, which is one of the five fair reasons for dismissal) and that they followed a fair process. If you know you are doing that, you’re fine.
Educate About the Process: Start by explaining the purpose of each meeting, the overall process, and what both parties can expect. Providing an internal FAQ document or referring to ACAS guidance can be immensely beneficial for their understanding.
Seek Outside Perspective: If you’re uncertain about any aspect, seeking advice, especially from an external source, can be invaluable. It’s an extra layer of assurance that you’re proceeding correctly. I offer a complimentary 30-minute consultation for new clients so you’re always welcome to book in call with me to chat things through.
Embrace the Appeal Process: If the employee raises the accusation post-dismissal, remember, the right to appeal is pivotal. It provides an opportunity for a thorough review and a chance to rectify any missteps. Engaging a neutral third party, like an independent HR consultant, for the appeal is highly advisable.
If you’re feeling uncertain or need support with your redundancy process, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Contact me at [email protected] or schedule a call at your convenience.
Breaking Down Barriers: Embracing Mediation for Effective Conflict Resolution
As a workplace mediator, I have countless conversations with managers and in-house HR teams who confide in me about the conflicts they are facing. Despite offering to resolve these conflicts in just one day, I often find that something holds them back from engaging my services. In this blog post, I explore the potential barriers that prevent HR teams from embracing mediation and highlight the transformative benefits of this constructive conflict resolution tool.
Lack of Awareness: One of the primary reasons HR teams might hesitate to use mediation is a lack of awareness about its benefits. The mediation process offers a safe and confidential space for parties to express their concerns and work towards mutually agreeable solutions. By educating HR teams about the positive outcomes mediation can achieve, we can help them make more informed choices when resolving workplace conflicts rather than just reaching for that trusty old Grievance policy.
Internal Resource Constraints: In-house HR teams often juggle multiple responsibilities, and conflict resolution may not be their sole focus. Limited time and resources might lead them to prioritize other tasks, inadvertently delaying the resolution of conflicts. However, understanding that early intervention can prevent issues from escalating will help HR teams recognize the value of engaging a mediator promptly. If you let things fester, things will invariably get worse, leading to lost productivity, low morale and even sickness absence.
Misconceptions about Mediation: Misunderstandings about mediation can also hinder its adoption. Some may believe that mediation is only suitable for severe conflicts or that it might exacerbate the situation. It’s crucial to debunk these myths and showcase how mediation fosters open communication and facilitates mutually beneficial resolutions. Mediation has a 95%+ success rate.
Attempting Informal Resolution: While informal approaches like counselling or direct discussions can be useful for minor issues, they may not suffice for more complex conflicts. HR teams may initially opt for these methods, hoping the problem will resolve itself, or even worse, line managers go for the “knock their heads together” tactic that seldom works. However, acknowledging when a conflict requires professional mediation can lead to more successful outcomes.
Fear of Escalation: Involving an external mediator may trigger concerns about escalating the conflict or making it appear more serious than it is. HR teams might hesitate to involve outsiders in internal matters. However, experienced mediators are skilled at creating a neutral environment and guiding parties towards constructive dialogue.
Internal Power Dynamics: Conflicts involving senior management or executives may create power imbalances that affect the mediation process. HR teams may worry about navigating such complexities, but addressing power dynamics is an essential part of a mediator’s role, leading to fair and equitable resolutions.
Previous Unsuccessful Experiences: Past unsuccessful attempts at mediation might make HR teams skeptical about its effectiveness. However, every conflict is unique, and the success of mediation depends on various factors, including the mediator’s expertise and the parties’ willingness to engage constructively.
Uncertainty About Mediator Selection: Selecting the right mediator can be daunting for HR teams, as different conflicts may require different approaches. Providing guidance on choosing a skilled mediator who aligns with the organization’s needs can alleviate this uncertainty.
In conclusion, as a workplace mediator, I believe that addressing these potential barriers is essential for promoting effective conflict resolution. By raising awareness, dispelling misconceptions, and demonstrating the transformative benefits of mediation, I can empower in-house HR teams to embrace this valuable tool. Early intervention, open communication, and skilled mediation can foster a positive and harmonious work environment, ultimately leading to greater organizational success. At Mayday HR, I am determined to break down the barriers and create a workplace culture that values constructive conflict resolution.
I am always keen to chat to people informally to explore if mediation is right for them. If you would like to book in a call, contact me on [email protected] or use the Get in Touch button.
Are workplace grievances taking up all your time? Do you find that workplace grievances actually damage working relationships more than fix them? Do you wish there was a better way to resolve conflict at work?
There is another way!
Ask any HR person, and they will tell you that they do everything they can to avoid an employee raising a grievance. It’s because they know that there are usually no winners in a grievance process and it doesn’t get to the root cause of the conflict.
Here are some reasons why grievances are so bad for us:
They can be time-consuming and costly for both the employee and the employer. The process of investigating and resolving a grievance can take weeks or even months, during which time the employee may be unable to work and the employer may have to divert resources away from other tasks.
Grievances can create an adversarial atmosphere in the workplace, which can be damaging to employee morale and productivity. Employees may become disengaged and less committed to their work if they feel that their employer is not treating them fairly.
Grievances can damage relationships between employees and employers. The process of a grievance can lead to feelings of mistrust and resentment, making it more difficult for the parties to work together effectively in the future.
Grievances can be a distraction from more important business issues. Employers may become so focused on resolving a grievance that they lose sight of more important matters that need their attention.
A grievance process may not necessarily lead to the best outcome for the parties involved. The decision made by the person responsible for grievance process may be perceived as unfair or biased, leading to further dissatisfaction and dissatisfaction.
Ultimately it is someone else making the decision or attempting to solve the problem. It isn’t treating employees like adults, and empowering them to make their own decisions.
But there is another way. Something that can be so transformational – mediation.
Here are some reasons why mediation can be so much better:
Mediation is often quicker and less expensive than a grievance process. A mediation session can be scheduled and completed within a few days or weeks whereas a grievance can take several months to resolve.
Mediation is less formal than a grievance process and allows for more open and flexible discussions. This can lead to more creative solutions that are tailored to the specific needs of the parties.
Meditation can help to preserve relationships between parties. The process is designed to be collaborative, rather than adversarial, which can help to reduce tensions and build trust between the parties.
Mediation allows the parties to have control over the outcome. They can craft a solution that works for them, rather than having a decision imposed on them by a third party.
Mediation can beu sed early on in the dispute resolution process, before the issues become more entrenched and difficult to resolve.
Mediation allows the parties to have a confidential and private discussion, which can be beneficial for sensitive or delicate matters.
If I have managed to convince you that meditation is the key to resolving conflict and saving you a lot of time, money and grief, please get in contact for a free, no obligation call to discuss your needs further. If you would like some support, I’d love to help you – email me on [email protected]
